♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 5 ♥ 0 8 ♥ 0 1 ♥ Bhaal'Daes ♥ To Limit the 'Manipulation' and Still Use FaceBook...

04:07 ~ It is possible to limit the 'manipulation' and still use FaceBook.  Yet, why doing so is a questionable use of time at best, and harmful at worst.  This, and other iNewspapers, is why  it is a questionable use of time.  It is probably more useful to extrovert, instead of introverts such as myself.

• Create FaceBook Account or strip your existing one of likes or friends.  Then hide it from the web. Then add, or keep, only the friends of which you actually are interested in letting their eventful news interrupt your daily life.
• That alone limits the FaceBook "news feed" to only them.  Ironically, FaceBook has been pretty good with responding to whatever security concerns that arise, whether it is adding security on their end or security options/tools for the user.
• At this time also consider limiting any 'likes' to charities and/or organizations, of which you actively are willing to let their news interrupt your daily life.
• Then install the FaceBook app {on Google'Play} on your phone, but only have this 'cloaked' account logged in.  That way you are automatically 'pinged' when there is news from the friends if which you choose to care.  That is far from necessarily a bad thing.

Time management is a necessary skill in life, as mortals we are unable to help or pay attention to absolutely everyone simultaneously, let alone to still have time for ourselves.  That said, helping charity and/or friends are, as well, an absolutely necessary part of ascending in this life.  Everyday ask yourself whether any particular decision helps others or helps yourself.

How do you think celebrities even have the time to use FaceBook at all...?...  However, if you are a fan of someone please avoid using this as a trigger to go searching for, and hounding their hidden account... privacy is important even for celebrities, regardless of what the courts say.  Just consider, if hiw willingly you are too let pure strangers to interrupt your life...  Then realize that negative attacks or replies, fail to ever end positively.

While using this cloaked F.B. account, avoid 'liking' or visiting anywhere on FaceBook but the 'Home' page and only charities and organizations that are actively welcome to interrupt thy daily life.  That makes a F.B. NewsFeed full of only news that have generically been welcomed previously;  And thus TruthStream Media's friends may find it easier to reach her for the next baby shower. ;)

Choosing to be 'ignorant' of the psychological effect that their product, would have had far worse fall out.   They are designing their product to literally subconsciously help others choose to be happy, how is that a bad thing...?...  "Everything" and even life itself has a "psychological impact" and most of it is subconscious for us mere mortals.  That someone is getting paid to help us use some of that subconscious, to help others choose to be happy seems abundantly far from a criminal act to me.

The producers of TruthStream Media seems very intelligent, wise, and awake to me;  However, there will always be a certain portion of thr public that are less intelligent, wise, and/or awake.  Of course, all are spiritually equal in the eyes of the Divine.  Yet, those people who are 'younger' souls will simply be unable to see what we, or what older souls that have weathered more stress, allow themselves to see.

In addition, TruthStream's description of the manipulation done by Social Media companies, and specifically FaceBook;  Seems as if they think there is this mythical place where people are free of all influences.  Yet even the idea of such a place seems rather horrid to me.

Humans are social creatures, and even intelligence itself is largely a trait only advanced by being an active 'member' of society.  Therefore, to be alive is to accept that others have influence on the thyself.

We humans are social creatures, if such a place did exist...?... we would devolve and die.  There are actually psychological real world examples of that.  For instance, there were some horrible grand parents locked an unwanted child up in the attic for their entire life.  When found... the now teenager was unable to coherently speak.

The point of mine, is that there will always be a segment of the public that have little interest in being consciously aware of their thoughts and emotions.  Such as Morpheus's line in the Matrix.  They will probably literally fight to stay within 'the matrix'.

They may be ready to ascend several lives from now;  But the stress accumulated from additional lifetimes is how they will get there…?...  Member the Buddhist saying there are many ways up the same mountain...?...

Thus, FaceBook and other social media, intentionally helping others subconsciously choose to live a happier life, seems pretty much like a good thing to me. Now if they were doing the opposite? that would be a problem, for me.

When the 'fear mongering' media has targeted someone;  A better question is 'why'.  P.o.t.U.S. Soetoro said himself, in a candid off'mic moment, that social media is his biggest enemy.  It seems that is a view shared by many of Mikie {Military Industrial Complex}, or whatever the reader wants to call it.  So why try to assist the Swamp in conjuring fear of social media...?...

Frankly, as the internet becomes used by more and more people;  Hopefully other start up companies follow FaceBook's example of creating a subconscious positive feed back loop with their users.  It is the same reason as why we eat food that tastes good, and why we throw away food that tastes bad.

The hope, for other startup companies to draw inspiration from FaceBook is because the idea that its current size and command of the market share, is that it has become a negative for any given user, is shared by me.   What they need is for MySpace to come back, along with others to grow in strength or be born and create a healthy Free Market place with abundant competition.

Abundant capitalistic competition in any field is always a benefit for the consumer.  Producers tend to be less enthused about it, but that just means they too are aware.

Having multiple channels in social media, increases the difficulty of the N.S.A., C.I.A., D.H.S., F.B.I. or any other agency in the alphabet soup to try to censor content, for "national security".  And anyone paying attention to Twitter and YouTube know there is far too much of that going around already.  Maybe people will remember why the scariest words in the English language are: "We are from the government, we are here to help." instead of forgetting why we're laughing.

So the suggestion of mine, is to pray for those forces to emerge and become stronger. That way T.S.M., and others have greater security in telling us information that the Mikies think validates their national security.

The government really should be 'afraid' of us citizens. When citizens are afraid of the government, that is tyranny.  Companies such as FaceBook that command an excessive share of the market has made themselves part of the problem.  Please, just remember that peaceful civil disobedience is far more inspiring towards other and less divisive than the violent kind.

However, honestly FaceBook is rarely used by me... that may change in the future, and if it does I will likely follow the above steps.

1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 4 ♥ 1 5 ♥ 0 0 ♥ Dias Marduk; Orville S01E03 by Fox

Humorously blatant statist brainwashing propaganda of a third episode to an otherwise wonderstrukk television series: Orville by Fox.  The show as a whole still does circles around the outrageously bogus Star Trek: Discovery produced by C.B.S., as a slap in the face to all Star Trek Fans.  This level of offense is similar to what Electronic Arts & BioWare did to fans of the Mass Effect franchise with how they wrote/produced the ending of Mass Effect III.

Read here for a more detailed accord of how few fucks were given by BioWare/E.A. on what the audience actually wanted from the third game.  The short of it, is that if they did choose to care what their fans wanted;  Then, they would have waited until Drew Karpyshyn was able and willing to spearhead the project.

The third episode in Orville first season, "About a Girl", is when the show's writers and producers made a bogus rip on the transgender debate in contemporary United States of America.  The one monolithic tragedy is how poorly the show relates to the issues that hermaphrodites face and the most successful strategies that parents, of hermaphrodites, have chosen.  The E.T.B.E. {Extra'Terrestrial Biological Entities} "girl" in question is born a girl, and the biological/societal E.T.B.E. parents want to hermetikally change the sex of the child to the same 'mono-gender' of their species.

Who this is coming from is part of the issue;  That is the same statist propagandized faction that are quick to mischaracterize all of the current United States's culture.  They are also eager to be critical of how poorly our ancestors treated the indigenous population of the Americas.  The point of mine, is that they advocating bullying the show's E.T.B.E. characters of this E.T.B.S. {Extra'Terrestrial Biological Species} into complying with the mischaracterized future "modern" culture of Terra.  By the Law of Attraction, the show's writers and producers dreadfully want our past to be horrendously repeated in the future.

What is so stark and thereby, is seen as forced brainwashing propaganda, by me.  Is that a sapient mono'gender species would see itself as free to either dual gender classification of male or female.  The show's writers erroneously expect such an E.T.B.S. as described in the show, to "claim" to be male.  Instead, only ignorant savages would seek to 'conform' to Terra's perception of gender.

Why this is even an issue is because the episode makes a big deal about the E.T.B.E. second tier characters of this E.T.B.S. performing peaceful civil disobedience against the Terran culture dominating this supposedly peaceful "Union" {a.k.a. Federation} ship, U.S.S. Orville.  There are always two sides to any problem, and of course the writers make a show of characterizing the human's insanity as repugnant.  Of course, it would be repugnant;  Except the entire scenario fails to make any logical or reasonable sense.
This is where the red line is drawn by me.  Thirteen minutes of the show is all that could be stomached, before the insanity threatened the harmony, serenity, and tranquility within me.  This is intentionally written to convey humor, because of how serious am I.
A scenario that would be a lot closer to be in'phase with our Prime Material, is the following.  A single gender E.T.B.S. would make it a point to correct any "human" that characterized them as male or female.  In the event that a 'girl' was born of a mono'gender species, they would fail to even suspect the child had a genetic mutation until the child's genetics were discovered.
Furthermore, a private militia that was under contract to represent the interests of a confederation;  That represented multiple different species from multiple different home'worlds...  Such a Navy would have trained its officers to be a great deal more tolerant and accepting of cultures and societies external to the officers' own.
The idea that the genetic deviation, or mutation, can be beneficial is worthy to focus an entire television episode, feel do I.  However, simply ignoring that the vast majority of mutations are in fact, harmful to the subject, is a disservice to the audience and makes the writers, producers, and directors of the show appear as ignorant hillbillies.