♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 7 ♥ 0 5 ♥ 0 4 ♥ Ka'Daes ♥ Owlcat Games Dev Twitch Stream for Pathfinder!

Watch live video from OwlcatGames on www.twitch.tvPathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous by Owlcat Games.

It is a computer Role-Playing Game using the Pathfinder ruleset that is curated by Paizo.  The game is set in a fantasy universe with elves, dwarves, et cetera and careers such as wizard, barbarian, paladin, rogue, et cetera.  The game's world and characters heavily reacts to player agency, allowing the player multiple ways of solving various problems that arise in our adventures.  Almost every character reacts in a wide array of paths to the player's choices for their protagonist.  For instance, depending on choices the character can explore a romantic relationship with one of the game's chief antagonist, as you give her a reason to fight against the control of another antagonist.

CRPGs with an abundance of player agency with multiple romance options with multiple other characters are what excite me.  This is beyond them having sex such as in Dragon Age.  It is how they react, and how their presence changes the protagonist's story.  For instance, a noble human in Dragon Age being able to marry Queen Anora Mac Tir Theirin near the end of the game.  The visually the character is gorgeous sure, and the game is bereft of a sex scene between the two.  However, her affect on the story is major.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 7 ♥ 0 1 ♥ 0 2 ♥ Enlil'Daes ♥ Re: Epic’s Plan Just BACKFIRED…

By Bellular News

GoG, MS Store, Origin, and Steam all have been used by me. Epic Store? It has been installed, but has yet to inspire a want sufficient enough to purchase a game from their store.  Them buying off publishers for timed exclusivity inspires only an interest in them being the last marketplace visited by me.

Competition is always great for the consumer. Their proprietary games on their own fail to really be in the wheelhouse of my interests. Games such as Outer Worlds and Control and even Borderlands. Grand Theft Auto are more of a venue that interests me, instead of Epic Game's Fornite.  In the beginning that was the only reason for a Game Studios to contract another company to "sell" a new release.  The prospective publisher is already known for a certain genre of games.

Outside the signing bonus, the reasoning and logic behind tying their exclusivity with a publisher store outside the prospective game's market audience is beyond the understanding of mine. Yet the signing bonus is literally stupid, the developer should refuse to allow the publisher to dictate retail exclusivity. The developer's producers are the one who got the funding for the game to be made. All the publisher does is sell it.

A 'signing' bonus is a lump sum of money that will be dwarfed by the game's overall revenue. It is small thinking, like a vampire wanting to kill off the human race... where do they think their going to get their food? Does the writers, directors, and producers really think their audience lack the intelligence to ask this question? If anything, the last year has shown us that S.J.W.s are quickly loosing whatever credibility corporate executives mistakenly gave them. That seems the only logical and reasonable reasoning for S.J.W.s doubling down on being even mor ludicrous to a target audience, as is apparent to the distortion of mine.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 7 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 1 9 ♥ Ka'Daes ♥ Re: NetFlix's Nightflyers

By NightFlyers

This is a post that may be updated in the future with more criticisms if there is enough compulsion to watch the show further.  The first five to fifteen minutes are critical for any show on the big or silver screen.  There is basically only one flow that guaranties it will be successful.

Apparently NetFlix has hired mostly garbage bin writers who fail at understanding how to weave a good story, for the super'majority of their recent releases.  Why they are intentionally coercing their customers to go to another platform is beyond the understanding of mine.

There is a basic skeleton to all successful myths and modern stories.  The feet of that skeleton begin with what is called "The Refusal of the Call".  It is the foundation on which the rest of the skeleton depends.  It is in this first act that the writer must 'show' why the audience should care about the protagonist.

The initial protagonist, Karl D'Branin in the first five to fifteen minutes does the exact opposite of refuse the call.  He jumps headlong into it.  What is even worse, is the writers seemingly deliberately try to compel the audience to dislike the protagonist, because his 'jumping towards the call' ties also into ditching his loving and caring wife and child.

Therefore, Karl begins the story with a huge negative.  Yet there fails to be any reason the audience should care about him.  The writers 'tell' the audience why they should care, but it really just comes across as him whining, about how his family is holding him back from career advancement... people generally don't watch whiners.

Naturally, the character is a white affluent male.  Of course, it could just be literary license, but given recent releases from Hollywood it can easily be seen as pandering to S.J.W.s {Social Justice Warriors} who fail to buy tickets or pay for subscriptions.  That is their thing, blowhards who only want to force their personal ethics and morals onto others.

Hopefully this perception is changed, even if it fails to interest future versions of myself to watch it.  For those whom humble me with further interest in my critic of this show;  If further time is invested in watching this series, below the time disparity will be noted.

Generally suspension of disbelief allow me to enjoy shows far more than most known to me.  So when a show bothers me, it seems others might benefit from learning why, if they wish to know.

For sharing the Force, grateful am I.  May the Goddess be allowed to alighten a path towards love, joy, and happiness along the self'determined life'cycle chosen by the higher'self of yours, pray do I.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 7 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 1 4 ♥ Lady'Daes ♥ Re: Steven Crowder: Thanksgiving is an Anathema of Racism | Change My Mind

By Mr. Steven Crowder

CORRECTION: The Conquistadors were 'given' the keys to Aztec throne because of the color of their skin... literally, think do I.  In their religion that was established a few hundred years prior, white skin and blond hair was a core characteristic for them to recognize their 'gods'.  So the Spanish show up, and Aztecs bow down...

Choosing to think Thanksgiving is racist {since some dictionaries seem confused on what is racism} is abundantly Fake News;  And the same is true for choosing to think the Spanish incited the Aztec poor into revolting.  When has "regime change" police ever worked over the long term?

Please stop calling them Mayans.  The Mayans disappeared over a millennium previous to the first signs of Aztecs.   Aztecs were a nomadic tribe that found the empty Mayan houses and decided to start squatting.  Calling current Mexicans of native descent "Mayans" is genetically and factually fake news.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 7 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 7 ♥ Lady'Daes ♥ Re: WestWorld and The Critical Drinker

By The Critical Drinker

The movie, and series, are essentially a futuristic take on theme'parks and L.A.R.P.ing {Live Action Role Playing}. And then what are the most popular themes of i.R.L. {in Real Life} LARPS? Those are the themes that a 'company' would explore because it would attract the most number of customers.

"Westworld" is a reboot of an older movie. The original was an amusement park with more than one "zone" people could visit. There was Medievalworld, Romanworld and Westworld. Thus Critical Drinker is simply wrong on the series changing the theme. All themeparks have multiple themes that are explored.

However, the point was each world was one that fit a basic genre, in which their audience wanted to 'play' a 'role'. Few fail to know anything of Shogun Japan, let alone enough to have an interest in roleplaying in it.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 6 ♥ 1 8 ♥ Ba'Daes ♥ Re: "... dislike it when an undesired male seeks their attention, thus how is such a male supposed to know this..."?

By Tim Pool

Stop thinking of In.Cels. {Involuntary Celibates} as if they are the class clown/dweeb.  Instead, acknowledge that there simply fails to be a rational and logical way of attracting an intelligent woman.  The type of women who frequent the local bars, are outside the interest of mine.  Statistically, a politician would be wondering why statism is the antithesis of the personality of mine.

The simple but effective argument to debunk these notions is to ask any Feminist what their solution is to their issue.  They dislike it when an undesired male seeks their attention, thus how is such a male supposed to know this without actually getting to know them?  They are big on complaining about what they don't like but fail to ever propose a solution that is attractive to both sexes, think do I.

People who fail to be those refered to as incels, also fail to have any clue what it is about.  The reason is simple, those who are incels fail to think of themselves as a victim.  Other than that there is likely to be an infinite number of reasons for why any particular person fits into this new category they want to fictitiously invent.

What is precisely bad about living with our parents?  Of course, there is a want for the house to be large enough to keep from people living ontop of each other.  However, the "nuclear family" is a very modern idea, and largely it may be contributing to many a failure of society.  For instance, single mothers would have aunts, uncles, parents, cousins, brothers, sisters, et cetera for chores such as child sitting, while they go on a date or go to work.

The idea that incels are mentally unstable "Jokers" in training is abhorrently misleadingly false.  Perhaps it is an example of the Lamestream Media trying to frame a false narrative around a subject "incels",  because whether they are a M.G.C.O.W., M.A.G.A., or M.R.A.

All animals have a drive for self'preservation.  If a bad owner hits a dog enough times, pretty soon the dog stops coming around the owner.  There has been far too many faux cries of 'rape', only to punish the male because of some reason or another.  Now it's "you must believe all victims!" and very few in the media ask 'why?'

The news holds up the scandals of Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, Mrs. Killary Clinton, Mr. Harvey Weinstein, et cetera as if they represent the attitude of the super'majority of men;  Or, that men in general are responsible for the actions of a few evil males grossly outside their social circle.

Then there is news of how some women, such as Ms. Alyssa Milano, give themselves trophies for how many abortions they have had.  That is only the highlights of a culture that demonizes and destroys the lives of any man having the audacity to benignly express interest in a woman.

Racism and sexism absolutely do exist on the planet Terra.  However, it was heavily in the minority until PotUS #44 Barry Soetoro began his eight years of war against american citizens.  They had to bus people in Ferguson, Missouri to start off the riots, because the people there knew better than to take a shit in your own bed.  MoreOver, choosing to be offended over words and calling it sexism/racism hurts the cases where people face real hardship and tough situations.

So in light of all of that political drama, women are surprised that men have taken a pass on playing their game?  Feminism won the war, and the super'majority get equal pay when compared with similar jobs;  For instance, an Engineer against another Engineer, or a Doctor versus another Doctor.  Now they have opened up new possibilities for the role women can play in a family.  Yet now they are surprised men have said "ok, you can be the breadwinner"?

Living life is at its core 'politics' and it reflects in every choice you make.  Do you expect someone to 'save you'?  Or do you solve your own problems, and along the way help others learn to solve their own problems.

Now the Swamp is so desperate to regain voters they are trying to create a new voting block by convincing "involuntary celibates" that they are also victims.  Well, for me, the response is... no.  "Incel" has, does, and will always fail to ever be a 'thing'.  It's only a symptom to systemic failures of the Swamp both culturally and in our government.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 5 ♥ 1 4 ♥ Sol'Daes ♥ Re: Women struggle to find good men...

By Tim Pool

Women struggle to find good men...

1. Most date "bad boys" until their 30+.  
2. Feminazis have made a concerted effort to criminalize 'approaching' women.  How is a guy supposed to know what is going in anyone else's head, let alone a woman?  
• If a woman doesn't like a guy who approaches with innocent/harmless romantic action, it is now automatic sexual harassment.
• The same innocent/harmless action done by a guy who the woman does like, then he is the only one who avoids being thrown in jail.
• Why should a guy risk the rest of their lives being ruined and possible jail time... for a woman who even if they do marry... are just as likely to file for divorce a year later?
• More and more guys are just passing on that calculus equation, and journo'lists and Feminazis are surprised?
• That is what unadulterated "#MeToo" has done to society.  There has been some good, but to ignore the bad is equally as horrid.
3. Women are all for earning more money but when they get it?  Then it seems people who make 'less' are considered "... below their class/level...".

Repeating the same action repeatedly and expecting a different result each time is a very good definition for insanity.  Women, who are "struggling" to find good men?  Maybe they should alter their search parameters, narrow it down to what is 'needed' instead of what they choose to "think" to want.

If they make more than two times the average comfortable living wage in their area, maybe at least go out to a coffee/tea cafe with a guy who does not for whatever reason, make as much.  Money for a hypothetical family is already covered yes?  Maybe they are an artist, maybe they are disabled from work for which they are qualified.

The point is that 'relationships' are supposed to be about two people sharing a life, instead of two 'equals' coming together to just live in the same house.  A man should be able to help the woman, and vice versa, in a psychologically fundamental way, think do I.

As one who is recognized by the state as physically disabled from doing work for which qualified am I?  This journo'list's assumption that men "below her level of income" are somehow less of a 'man' because of it, can easily be as offensive as if the reverse was said.  What would be the typical journo'list response to a man who says '... women who make more than blank annual wage are less attractive...'?

To take the cake, Journo'lists are surprised that the public is rejecting them and their crazy.  Women spent a century working on being accepted as a possible "breadwinner" for a family.

Congratulations!!!
Women got what they wanted!  Yet they still expect the man to be the breadwinner?  However, they justify it;  They are fooling themselves into being blind to their own hypocritical bigotry...  exactly what Feminazies say about the "white cis patriarchy".

And Ms. Fishberg's response to the possibility of not finding such a man?  To reinforce another stereotype of lesbians as closet bisexuals.  That's like the little kid in the playground taking their toys and running away because others refused to bend to the will of the one throwing the tantrum.

For the record, anybody who tries to "censor" another for holding a different political opinion is a fascist, by the definition of mine.  Female fascists who apply their brand of crazy towards others because of age, sex, or race is a Feminazi, by the definition of mine.

In addition, age/race/sex neither physically nor through peer pressure prevent a biological entity from recognizing racism, sexism, and all the other 'ism's.  The only way to be "blind" to it is by conscious choice.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 5 ♥ 0 7 ♥ Ba'Daes ♥ Re: Why Not Let Women Be Drafted?

By Tim Pool

There is a very good reason for South Korea's draft.  It is the same reason Israel has a draft.  It is a requirement to spend at least 2 years in the military.  That fails to be 'difficult' to accomplish.  The good reason they have is the view they should not exist, or pushed into the ocean, by the neighboring state.  For South Korea, it is both China and North Korea.  For Israel it is all Muslim States;  And, idiots still want to force Israel to give Hamas a state. 😅

If women want the right to vote, at the same time they should be included in the draft.  They 'should' have combat roles in the military, there are women with combat roles in the Bible;  And yet some try to frame this as prejudice from 'religious'. 🤡🌏

The only way to circumvent the draft is to volunteer to join the military.  That way a new recruit can choose what job they will be trained for.  Those who wait until they are drafted fail to be given a choice, they are assigned whatever job the military needs the most.😎
🌒🌕🌘