♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 5 ♥ 1 4 ♥ Sol'Daes ♥ Re: Women struggle to find good men...

By Tim Pool

Women struggle to find good men...

1. Most date "bad boys" until their 30+.  
2. Feminazis have made a concerted effort to criminalize 'approaching' women.  How is a guy supposed to know what is going in anyone else's head, let alone a woman?  
• If a woman doesn't like a guy who approaches with innocent/harmless romantic action, it is now automatic sexual harassment.
• The same innocent/harmless action done by a guy who the woman does like, then he is the only one who avoids being thrown in jail.
• Why should a guy risk the rest of their lives being ruined and possible jail time... for a woman who even if they do marry... are just as likely to file for divorce a year later?
• More and more guys are just passing on that calculus equation, and journo'lists and Feminazis are surprised?
• That is what unadulterated "#MeToo" has done to society.  There has been some good, but to ignore the bad is equally as horrid.
3. Women are all for earning more money but when they get it?  Then it seems people who make 'less' are considered "... below their class/level...".

Repeating the same action repeatedly and expecting a different result each time is a very good definition for insanity.  Women, who are "struggling" to find good men?  Maybe they should alter their search parameters, narrow it down to what is 'needed' instead of what they choose to "think" to want.

If they make more than two times the average comfortable living wage in their area, maybe at least go out to a coffee/tea cafe with a guy who does not for whatever reason, make as much.  Money for a hypothetical family is already covered yes?  Maybe they are an artist, maybe they are disabled from work for which they are qualified.

The point is that 'relationships' are supposed to be about two people sharing a life, instead of two 'equals' coming together to just live in the same house.  A man should be able to help the woman, and vice versa, in a psychologically fundamental way, think do I.

As one who is recognized by the state as physically disabled from doing work for which qualified am I?  This journo'list's assumption that men "below her level of income" are somehow less of a 'man' because of it, can easily be as offensive as if the reverse was said.  What would be the typical journo'list response to a man who says '... women who make more than blank annual wage are less attractive...'?

To take the cake, Journo'lists are surprised that the public is rejecting them and their crazy.  Women spent a century working on being accepted as a possible "breadwinner" for a family.

Congratulations!!!
Women got what they wanted!  Yet they still expect the man to be the breadwinner?  However, they justify it;  They are fooling themselves into being blind to their own hypocritical bigotry...  exactly what Feminazies say about the "white cis patriarchy".

And Ms. Fishberg's response to the possibility of not finding such a man?  To reinforce another stereotype of lesbians as closet bisexuals.  That's like the little kid in the playground taking their toys and running away because others refused to bend to the will of the one throwing the tantrum.

For the record, anybody who tries to "censor" another for holding a different political opinion is a fascist, by the definition of mine.  Female fascists who apply their brand of crazy towards others because of age, sex, or race is a Feminazi, by the definition of mine.

In addition, age/race/sex neither physically nor through peer pressure prevent a biological entity from recognizing racism, sexism, and all the other 'ism's.  The only way to be "blind" to it is by conscious choice.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 5 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 0 0 ♥ Ba'Daes ♥ Please, Save BioWare from E.A.❗️

Please, some absurdly rich sapient with service'to'others intent, buy BioWare from E.A.❗️  The biblical service’to’self reptiles of E.A. are destroying the owners of a couple beloved franchises…❗️…  with their material wealth love affair with microtransactions.  It is the real reason for why they closed both Visceral Studios and Bethesda's Montreal Studio.

All anyone who is getting paycheck or wants something from E.A., what they think of their former boss and they all say the same thing as if scripted.  How many massive companies have hundreds of thousands of employees and none of them have cause to say something bad after being fired…?…  The very idea is so lacking in wisdom that even Hollywood has yet to use it as an excuse in one of their shows.

And the employees have the exact same imagination on what they think would have happened…?…  For example, look at BioWare's current and former employees that worked on said beehive franchises Dragon Age: Origin, Mass Effect {regretfully E.A. got it’s fingers into the third game}, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic.  There is something that smells like rotten fish, with this 'information', to me.

Furthermore, there are reviewers {such as Gameranx} still defend and apologize for E.A., literally as if they are still being paid for it.  When does an entire body of professionals all agree on anything…?…  Understandably this is an outrageous claim, but treating 'speculation' on the financial health of BioWare in a world where they avoided selling out to E.A. as not hearsay, is simply ludicrous.  The fact that they worked for the company is irrelevant.  Unless they're referencing specific work from a Remote Viewing artist, which would surprise me.

Even if true, there is a hundred of other v.game companies that they could have sold out to with a much better track record. But no, they choose the one with the biggest check; And seemingly willfully ignored they were handing their baby over to the company with the worst reputation.

A prime example is when ZeniMax bought Bethesda Software. They've made great products and their Creation Club has all the signs of just allowing them to extend Post Production on all of their franchises simultaneously. His many free mods are there for Battlefront 2, made by independent artists…?…

When E.A. learned that Visceral Games' current RPG baby for Star Wars was impossible to turn into another gamer nightmare of a cash'cow…?… E.A. shut the company down.

A more likely story for BioWare's Montreal Studio, is that they refused to implement B2's example of locking P.v.E. story progression behind randomized D.L.C. loot boxes that may, or may not, have what you want.  That infuriated key E.A. bean counters, and they couldn't be having some peon being insubordinate.  Thus, outrageously bad press from key reviewers and YouTube censorship was bought for the game’s launch.

Ever wonder why every reviewer that had something bad to say about Mass Effect: Andromeda repeated the exact same examples?  It's a big game with plenty of material to cover, probability alone says their review might be similar, but never identical. Then it was the fact the reviews were released within the first two weeks of release.  Mar 20^th, 2017 for fig’s sake!  Yes they get an advanced copy of the game for review but its far from that advanced.

And who was left behind after the exodus…?… the personnel controlling multiplayer side of the game. The one side of the game that the E.A. demons wanted. And when no one was looking, they quietly fired the P.v.E. centric employees, then covered that buy “merging” BioWare Montreal with E.A. Motive, that has been properly 'cowed' to E.A. authority.

The fact that E.A. is headquartered in Redmond City, California says enough on is own. The Mecca for all who believe in the religious dogma of statism, feel do I.  Given California’s monumental debt that they refuse to pay for, and their erroneous belief they can tax themselves out from under it.  It is understandable that some may want to pad the coffers for when taxes roll around.

However, an even better option is to do what BioWare did before they were bought, move to Austin, Texas.  Sure Texans have herded the supermajority of their minority of statists into the one city of Austin, but at least they don’t have to deal with the 8.84% Corporate taxes of California.  For your information, Texas’s corporate tax rate is 0.00%.