Showing posts with label Tim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tim. Show all posts

10.23.2019

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 6 ♥ 1 8 ♥ Ba'Daes ♥ Re: "... dislike it when an undesired male seeks their attention, thus how is such a male supposed to know this..."?


Stop thinking of In.Cels. {Involuntary Celibates} as if they are the class clown/dweeb.  Instead, acknowledge that there simply fails to be a rational and logical way of attracting an intelligent woman.  The type of women who frequent the local bars, are outside the interest of mine.  Statistically, a politician would be wondering why statism is the antithesis of the personality of mine.

The simple but effective argument to debunk these notions is to ask any Feminist what their solution is to their issue.  They dislike it when an undesired male seeks their attention, thus how is such a male supposed to know this without actually getting to know them?  They are big on complaining about what they don't like but fail to ever propose a solution that is attractive to both sexes, think do I.

People who fail to be those refered to as incels, also fail to have any clue what it is about.  The reason is simple, those who are incels fail to think of themselves as a victim.  Other than that there is likely to be an infinite number of reasons for why any particular person fits into this new category they want to fictitiously invent.

What is precisely bad about living with our parents?  Of course, there is a want for the house to be large enough to keep from people living ontop of each other.  However, the "nuclear family" is a very modern idea, and largely it may be contributing to many a failure of society.  For instance, single mothers would have aunts, uncles, parents, cousins, brothers, sisters, et cetera for chores such as child sitting, while they go on a date or go to work.

The idea that incels are mentally unstable "Jokers" in training is abhorrently misleadingly false.  Perhaps it is an example of the Lamestream Media trying to frame a false narrative around a subject "incels",  because whether they are a M.G.C.O.W., M.A.G.A., or M.R.A.

All animals have a drive for self'preservation.  If a bad owner hits a dog enough times, pretty soon the dog stops coming around the owner.  There has been far too many faux cries of 'rape', only to punish the male because of some reason or another.  Now it's "you must believe all victims!" and very few in the media ask 'why?'

The news holds up the scandals of Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, Mrs. Killary Clinton, Mr. Harvey Weinstein, et cetera as if they represent the attitude of the super'majority of men;  Or, that men in general are responsible for the actions of a few evil males grossly outside their social circle.

Then there is news of how some women, such as Ms. Alyssa Milano, give themselves trophies for how many abortions they have had.  That is only the highlights of a culture that demonizes and destroys the lives of any man having the audacity to benignly express interest in a woman.

Racism and sexism absolutely do exist on the planet Terra.  However, it was heavily in the minority until PotUS #44 Barry Soetoro began his eight years of war against american citizens.  They had to bus people in Ferguson, Missouri to start off the riots, because the people there knew better than to take a shit in your own bed.  MoreOver, choosing to be offended over words and calling it sexism/racism hurts the cases where people face real hardship and tough situations.

So in light of all of that political drama, women are surprised that men have taken a pass on playing their game?  Feminism won the war, and the super'majority get equal pay when compared with similar jobs;  For instance, an Engineer against another Engineer, or a Doctor versus another Doctor.  Now they have opened up new possibilities for the role women can play in a family.  Yet now they are surprised men have said "ok, you can be the breadwinner"?

Living life is at its core 'politics' and it reflects in every choice you make.  Do you expect someone to 'save you'?  Or do you solve your own problems, and along the way help others learn to solve their own problems.

Now the Swamp is so desperate to regain voters they are trying to create a new voting block by convincing "involuntary celibates" that they are also victims.  Well, for me, the response is... no.  "Incel" has, does, and will always fail to ever be a 'thing'.  It's only a symptom to systemic failures of the Swamp both culturally and in our government.

9.29.2019

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 5 ♥ 1 4 ♥ Sol'Daes ♥ Re: Women struggle to find good men...


Women struggle to find good men...
  1. Most date "bad boys" until their 30+.  
  2. Feminazis have made a concerted effort to criminalize 'approaching' women.  How is a guy supposed to know what is going in anyone else's head, let alone a woman?  
    • If a woman doesn't like a guy who approaches with innocent/harmless romantic action, it is now automatic sexual harassment.
    • The same innocent/harmless action done by a guy who the woman does like, then he is the only one who avoids being thrown in jail.
    • Why should a guy risk the rest of their lives being ruined and possible jail time... for a woman who even if they do marry... are just as likely to file for divorce a year later?
    • More and more guys are just passing on that calculus equation, and journo'lists and Feminazis are surprised?
    • That is what unadulterated "#MeToo" has done to society.  There has been some good, but to ignore the bad is equally as horrid.
  3. Women are all for earning more money but when they get it?  Then it seems people who make 'less' are considered "... below their class/level...".
Repeating the same action repeatedly and expecting a different result each time is a very good definition for insanity.  Women, who are "struggling" to find good men?  Maybe they should alter their search parameters, narrow it down to what is 'needed' instead of what they choose to "think" to want.

If they make more than two times the average comfortable living wage in their area, maybe at least go out to a coffee/tea cafe with a guy who does not for whatever reason, make as much.  Money for a hypothetical family is already covered yes?  Maybe they are an artist, maybe they are disabled from work for which they are qualified.

The point is that 'relationships' are supposed to be about two people sharing a life, instead of two 'equals' coming together to just live in the same house.  A man should be able to help the woman, and vice versa, in a psychologically fundamental way, think do I.

As one who is recognized by the state as physically disabled from doing work for which qualified am I?  This journo'list's assumption that men "below her level of income" are somehow less of a 'man' because of it, can easily be as offensive as if the reverse was said.  What would be the typical journo'list response to a man who says '... women who make more than blank annual wage are less attractive...'?

To take the cake, Journo'lists are surprised that the public is rejecting them and their crazy.  Women spent a century working on being accepted as a possible "breadwinner" for a family.

Congratulations!!!
Women got what they wanted!  Yet they still expect the man to be the breadwinner?  However, they justify it;  They are fooling themselves into being blind to their own hypocritical bigotry...  exactly what Feminazies say about the "white cis patriarchy".

And Ms. Fishberg's response to the possibility of not finding such a man?  To reinforce another stereotype of lesbians as closet bisexuals.  That's like the little kid in the playground taking their toys and running away because others refused to bend to the will of the one throwing the tantrum.

For the record, anybody who tries to "censor" another for holding a different political opinion is a fascist, by the definition of mine.  Female fascists who apply their brand of crazy towards others because of age, sex, or race is a Feminazi, by the definition of mine.

In addition, age/race/sex neither physically nor through peer pressure prevent a biological entity from recognizing racism, sexism, and all the other 'ism's.  The only way to be "blind" to it is by conscious choice.

9.06.2019

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 4 ♥ 0 9 ♥ Ba'Daes ♥ Re: Democrat Socialist Candidate SHOCKED After Finding the Lamestream Media "...are mean and they lie..."

BREAKING NEWS:
Calling them "liberals" has been ironic for the past few decades.  This is why Libertarians are taking the label back, from their party that should be called the Democrat Socialist Party.  That is the general platform of their policies since the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

There is a very reasonable and logical hypothesis that the Deep State has pushed with continuing to use this label for Democrat Party.  It directly contradicts what the average citizen is taught to define as "liberal".  This keeps the Cloward'Piven drama going stronger, farther, faster...

That is what has inflated this "bubble" referred to by Tim Pool.  The internet has helped all see that we are all one.  We are uniting, and they are desperate to try to compel the ever'dwindling pool of statist to continue their divisive faux political theater.

Ultimately, libertarian socialism still fails, because of the likely education/perception of the new young adults who grow up in those "communes".  They are unlikely to provide a balanced education because it is against their beliefs and a small commune is all about beliefs, let alone able to 'afford' the resources needed to make up for the opposing opinion.  Public Schools are either unable or unwilling to do this, thus why expect it of a commune.?.  How many young adults come out of Quaker communes claiming they are atheists.?.

9.01.2019

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 4 ♥ 0 5 ♥ Sol'Daes ♥ Change Selection Method of Federal Senators & President of the United States


The rich are only able to run for Federal Senators and the President of the United States because of the money needed for their campaign.

That is the reason popularity contests are against what our Founding Parents wanted for the election of Senators and P.o.t.U.S.  Senators are selected by State Governors/Legislator as decided by choice of state citizen.  The Electoral College was supposed to decide the P.o.t.U.S. all by themselves.  Each E.C. vote is selected by their the states.😅

That ensures equity of representation for each state in a selection of the P.o.t.U.S. {President of the United States}

Therefore, we should return to the original selection method. 😎

A.O.C. is a very bad example for support to increase the pay of federal politicians;  She denies Trump monie for Border Patrol, yet she wants more money...
🌒🌕🌘

2.15.2019

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 0 4 ♥ 0 8 ♥ Lady'Daes ♥ Re: Trump Accused Of HYPOCRISY Over National Emergency


[HYPOCRISY] Again statists in both political pseudo'parties fall far short of understanding what "National Emergency" means.  P.o.t.U.S. Donald John Trump already made the case for the Legislatures' failure to solve the boarder crises, and more than a super'majority of citizens agree with the idea that it is a "National Emergency" as he defines it. Therefore, the courts will be throwing out all litigation addressing it; That is what they do when, lame duck sore losers, force them to face 'governing policy', instead of actual law.

[LAWSUIT] The statists' response of trying to 'litigate' their policies was expected, and it will end in failure. That is why it took three years to happen, P.o.t.U.S. Trump was moving the chess pieces on the board. This is all just the endgame of a game, that they have already lost... and, they will fail to get any medal for it.

[LAMEDUCK SORE LOOSERS] The only chance the statists had was the recent midterm election. The Deep State needed to win both houses of the legislative branch, for the Supreme Court to consider it the 'will of our society'. Yet they fell far short, and they let P.o.t.U.S. Trump paint them, with neon pastel colors, as the Bad Guy with the recent government shutdown.

As has been said many times, plebeians know whether they have a job, and if their paychecks are bigger; Regardless of what the Ls.M. says. That is why Reagan did, and why P.o.t.U.S. Trump will, win re'election. In addition, there may be one or two good reporters, but at the end of the day even Sean Hannity was overruled in showing his "Clinton'Gate" special of Dec'18.

In the modern times, what many people seem to be missing is that the only people who watch the Ls.M. for news, are the mentally ill. [1]  By mental illness, it means that at one or more points, the psyche in question fails. They simply fail to follow the tracks of logic and reason; One, or two, of the steps simply escape their perceived reality. {12, 3, & 4}  Such as the Psychology 101 video of the basketball playing Gorilla.

Mr. Tim Pool {1, 2, & 3}, seemingly the previous description fails to describe you as far as what can be seen by me. You use empirical evidence, logic, and reasoning, think do I. Why you insist on calling yourself a Democrat is beyond the understanding of mine. The statists and theologians of your party kicked all liberals out, before either of us were born. {1, 2, & 3}  Goldwater's Republicans are the ones who pushed forward the Civil Rights Acts starting in 1964.