♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 7 ♥ 0 1 ♥ 0 2 ♥ Enlil'Daes ♥ Re: Epic’s Plan Just BACKFIRED…

By Bellular News

GoG, MS Store, Origin, and Steam all have been used by me. Epic Store? It has been installed, but has yet to inspire a want sufficient enough to purchase a game from their store.  Them buying off publishers for timed exclusivity inspires only an interest in them being the last marketplace visited by me.

Competition is always great for the consumer. Their proprietary games on their own fail to really be in the wheelhouse of my interests. Games such as Outer Worlds and Control and even Borderlands. Grand Theft Auto are more of a venue that interests me, instead of Epic Game's Fornite.  In the beginning that was the only reason for a Game Studios to contract another company to "sell" a new release.  The prospective publisher is already known for a certain genre of games.

Outside the signing bonus, the reasoning and logic behind tying their exclusivity with a publisher store outside the prospective game's market audience is beyond the understanding of mine. Yet the signing bonus is literally stupid, the developer should refuse to allow the publisher to dictate retail exclusivity. The developer's producers are the one who got the funding for the game to be made. All the publisher does is sell it.

A 'signing' bonus is a lump sum of money that will be dwarfed by the game's overall revenue. It is small thinking, like a vampire wanting to kill off the human race... where do they think their going to get their food? Does the writers, directors, and producers really think their audience lack the intelligence to ask this question? If anything, the last year has shown us that S.J.W.s are quickly loosing whatever credibility corporate executives mistakenly gave them. That seems the only logical and reasonable reasoning for S.J.W.s doubling down on being even mor ludicrous to a target audience, as is apparent to the distortion of mine.

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 1 5 ♥ 1 4 ♥ Sol'Daes ♥ Re: Women struggle to find good men...

By Tim Pool

Women struggle to find good men...

1. Most date "bad boys" until their 30+.  
2. Feminazis have made a concerted effort to criminalize 'approaching' women.  How is a guy supposed to know what is going in anyone else's head, let alone a woman?  
• If a woman doesn't like a guy who approaches with innocent/harmless romantic action, it is now automatic sexual harassment.
• The same innocent/harmless action done by a guy who the woman does like, then he is the only one who avoids being thrown in jail.
• Why should a guy risk the rest of their lives being ruined and possible jail time... for a woman who even if they do marry... are just as likely to file for divorce a year later?
• More and more guys are just passing on that calculus equation, and journo'lists and Feminazis are surprised?
• That is what unadulterated "#MeToo" has done to society.  There has been some good, but to ignore the bad is equally as horrid.
3. Women are all for earning more money but when they get it?  Then it seems people who make 'less' are considered "... below their class/level...".

Repeating the same action repeatedly and expecting a different result each time is a very good definition for insanity.  Women, who are "struggling" to find good men?  Maybe they should alter their search parameters, narrow it down to what is 'needed' instead of what they choose to "think" to want.

If they make more than two times the average comfortable living wage in their area, maybe at least go out to a coffee/tea cafe with a guy who does not for whatever reason, make as much.  Money for a hypothetical family is already covered yes?  Maybe they are an artist, maybe they are disabled from work for which they are qualified.

The point is that 'relationships' are supposed to be about two people sharing a life, instead of two 'equals' coming together to just live in the same house.  A man should be able to help the woman, and vice versa, in a psychologically fundamental way, think do I.

As one who is recognized by the state as physically disabled from doing work for which qualified am I?  This journo'list's assumption that men "below her level of income" are somehow less of a 'man' because of it, can easily be as offensive as if the reverse was said.  What would be the typical journo'list response to a man who says '... women who make more than blank annual wage are less attractive...'?

To take the cake, Journo'lists are surprised that the public is rejecting them and their crazy.  Women spent a century working on being accepted as a possible "breadwinner" for a family.

Congratulations!!!
Women got what they wanted!  Yet they still expect the man to be the breadwinner?  However, they justify it;  They are fooling themselves into being blind to their own hypocritical bigotry...  exactly what Feminazies say about the "white cis patriarchy".

And Ms. Fishberg's response to the possibility of not finding such a man?  To reinforce another stereotype of lesbians as closet bisexuals.  That's like the little kid in the playground taking their toys and running away because others refused to bend to the will of the one throwing the tantrum.

For the record, anybody who tries to "censor" another for holding a different political opinion is a fascist, by the definition of mine.  Female fascists who apply their brand of crazy towards others because of age, sex, or race is a Feminazi, by the definition of mine.

In addition, age/race/sex neither physically nor through peer pressure prevent a biological entity from recognizing racism, sexism, and all the other 'ism's.  The only way to be "blind" to it is by conscious choice.