♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 5 ♥ 1 1 ♥ 1 5 ♥ Sylilo'Daes ♥ NetFlix Shows Itself as Ignorant on What Americans Want as Statists

Rush Limbaugh is right yet again, and after three decades he is only showing signs of a want for more.  NetFlix quarter earnings reports fell way below expectations, and they seem to fail at possessing a clue as to why.  Two months ago, they announced signing a contract with Mr. & Mrs. Soetoro and their two adopted children.

Boycotts is the economic equivalent of "an eye for an eye" and as the saying goes, it only leaves everyone blind.  Liberty minded people should work on being better than the statists, the ignorant plebeians, and District of Columbia [1].  Responding to a negative issue with more negativity only breeds more negativity, and a worse situation over all;  In contrast, by making the choice to be positive we have the chance of making the situation better.

That is why my Netflix subscription is still active.  However, by the Lady, they should listen to this.  Fire Susan Rice, and terminate whatever the contract is with the Soetoro family.  Wall Street may have liked it, but your audience has already shown you that a significant portion of your subscribers reject it.

This is another great example why 'people and companies in entertainment should avoid favoring any major political' icon.  In general they should avoid getting into any of District of Columbia's Comedy of Errors.  The Dixie Chicks, and the all too common compulsion to talk about politics, is another great example of why all souls who make a living in entertainment and customer service in general should avoid even the hint of politics.

Netflix may can claim that the shows made by the Soetoro's are not politics all it wants.  The reality is that everything is politics, it relates to how they choose to live their life.  Does Joe and Jane claim more than two social identities?  When face with a problem does Joe and Jane call for help, and wait for someone to "save them"? [1]  Does Joe and Jane give to charity?

The second question is making the presumption that Joe and Jane have skills that can solve said problem.  The third question is something statists try to hide, but they rarely if ever give to charity.  If one was being honest with themselves and you, it would be because they view the Government as a giant charity and that is the purpose of tax revenue.

What is worse the way Netflix describes the Soetoro Family coming this November, screams of politics.  The American Citizens have grow weary and tired of Soetoro's eight years of double talk and vague promises such as "Hope and Change". [1]  He already taught us to ask "Hope for what...?... and changing to what...?..."

So Netflix, please listen to us and cut them out before the cancerous tumor, that you have let grow into you, before it is able to cause any further damage your company.

Letter to Tea Party people

2 things to help with PR battle.  Young people are 'new' and so is the 60% who are busy living their life versus reading the newspaper.  The common layperson sees "liberal" as 'libertarian' or 'liberty'.   Speak their language if you want "the general public" to understand instead of those in District of Columbia.  They already see themselves as "libertarians" and if we want to 'correct' them;  First step is to start speaking in a way they understand, instead of repeating the Statists' "misspellings and incorrect grammar".

• Use the correct dictionary definition of "liberal" which is libertarian.  Democrats are 'statist', 'socialists', or 'communists' but on the opposite end of the spectrum to 'liberals'.
• "Democratic Party" fails to exist.  There is only the "Democrat Party";  Which of course also fails but in an another topic.

A user's misspelling words and incorrect grammar on a message board, twitter, or some other social media technology is fine, and perfectly understandable.  For an 'organization' to do so, detracts from the 'message' as people automatically think less of the organization.  These common grammar error makes our organization look foolish, illiterate, uneducated, and ignorant.

I think misrepresenting the word 'liberal' is intentional as far as the Carnegie Foundation, Tides Foundation, George Soros, and their ilk are concerned.  They love being called a sheep instead of a wolf; or angels instead of the demons.  It confuses the low information voter.

Also, I think the mistake with the word "Democratic" is intentional for similar reasons.  Though maybe its more of a sign of how far our education system has fallen.

Apparently people often fail to realize how much power words have, especially when they are spoken with "mistakes".

Laffer Curve

Cutting taxes raises revenue. This relationship works in reverse as well. Increases taxes reduces revenue. Only the broken psyche of the so called "Democrats", and their statist ilk, have a problem with this scientific and mathematical logic. Yet the statist created agency called the Congressional Budget Office {C.B.O.} confuse the reverse of the Laffer Curve as true. This is why "Congress" in Washington D.C. get such wrong numbers one what effect their bills have on the economy.

For two centuries science has been able to compile mathematical economic numbers for trillions of transactions in free market economies around the world. In the early 1900s a man named John Maynard Keyne wrongly assumed that government spending has a positive effect on the economy. The statists Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, and Franklin D. Roosevelt all grabbed onto this theory immediately like a lifesaver thrown to someone drowning. So, economics quickly created a name for this too called Keynesian economics.

The problem is that to spend money, government must use force to "take" money from its citizens. Doing this destroys jobs! The effect is so disastrous that there is zero hope for the government to create more jobs than are lost. The reason this is true is because when the government does this. Those who have money "protect" their money and protecting it is the opposite of investing it. So the total amount of money taken out of the system is greater than what the government has to spend.

Even if the Government creates more money this actually creates a universal tax by default. This universal tax is inflation as every dollar is worth less than it was yesterday. It takes more dollars to buy the same thing today than it did yesterday. This is what inflation is and it destroys wealth. This action is so disastrous that economists have a special name for it called "monetizing" the debt. The Federal Reserve Bank, has been doing it for half a decade now and it is demonically evil for them to do so.

Only private sector investments creates jobs. There is a sweet bell in the Laffer Curve around thirteen percent. This thirteen percent is the sweet spot where tax revenue is maximized. Another way to look at this is to realize that the "economy" is like water. If you make a fist, the water slips through your fingers. When you open your hands and form a cup, you hold a great deal more water than your fist ever could.

The mind of a statist is locked in the past. All they see is last years "economy" and falsely wish they could take a slice of the pie. This is how the C.B.O. comes up with numbers that are so very wrong. The reason they are wrong is because the pie is yesterday's pie and we are talking about a "future" pie. Through taking action today.

A Libertarian like Laffer uses geometry and calculus, instead of algebra, to come up with numbers of next year. Look at recent history of trends and overall change in various different ways. Then a winner like Laffer uses calculus and geometry to make the hurdle of finding "next years" numbers. The more precise the data the more accurate they end up being. That is how an agency like the Heritage Foundation create a track record of being right 96.8% of the time. Among other things they do what the C.B.O. does but Heritage ends up be right far more often.