1 3 ❤ 0 0 ❤ 0 2 ❤ 0 8 ❤ 1 7 ❤ Dies Pa: Voter Fraud 2014: Why Does Megyn Kelly continue claiming Barry 'won' the 2014 election?

Mister Barry Soetoro failed to actually win either election in 2008 or 2014.  He stole the election through lies, cheating, and voter fraud.  I am absolutely and abundantly tired of the talking heads on cable news and the LSM refusing to admit that the courts have already reached their verdict

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/368234/voter-fraud-weve-got-proof-its-easy-john-fund

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/03/oh-my-evidence-of-massive-voter-fraud-in-north-carolina-n1818137

http://www.inquisitr.com/1572639/2014-election-results-democrat-voter-fraud-caught-in-arizona-maryland-and-illinois/

https://www.rnla.org/votefraud.asp

Those are just four examples.  Of course, the Statists such as the "Daily KOS" fail at trying to discredit this.  They fail because they cherry pick what reports they can find to debunk.  Then they use that cherry picked data to claim the rest are the same.

However, Court rulings and committee investigations are infinitely more reliable and credible than the Daily KOS's talking heads.

So why are the reporters on Fox News continuing to report this lie as if it is fact?  They are supposed to be the voice of Freedom and Liberty,

1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 2 ♥ 0 8 ♥ 1 7 ♥ Dies Pa: Wash ComPost: RePost: Reporter Says Pentagon is full of 'B.S.'

B.S. = Bull Shit
B.S. = PotUS Barry Soetoro
get it?
Yes I know I am juvenile but at least I admit it, unlike Mr. BS

O.N.A.'s response is legaleze for "I am just a defense attorney kum buck37 for a bunch of Muslim Brotherhood.  You know how they treat women?  I have no fraking clue what you are talking about."

I mean really what is Speaker Boner going to say about it?  AND is that before or after his latest golf 'meeting' {circle jerk} with PotUS Barry Soetoro?

Speaker Boner COULD do something beautiful like stop all funding of the Executive Branch indefinitely;  and then WAAIIITTT for them to fold.  LET the LSM fail to tar and feather him to their already dwindling audience that fails to make up a significant portion of the American voting citizenry.

However, the only people who seem to fail to understand that Speaker Boner is a traitor and a District of Columbia thugish statist is the few hundred thousand that form his constituent base.

"We can't find the reports... hmmm... I wonder where they got that from... probably their fearful leader PotUS Barry Soetoro.

WASHINGTON COMPOST {W.CP.}:

Everyone has a F.O.I.A. {Freedom Of Information Act} horror story, though the one told by Vice News investigative reporter Jason Leopold in today’s F.O.I.A. hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee deserves its very own headline.

When asked about why some agencies just refuse to cough up material, Leopold offered this example:

LEOPOLD: The Office of Net Assessment {ONA} is the Pentagon’s in-house think tank. They spend millions and millions of dollars putting together reports — reports that they contract out about perhaps some futuristic warfare, or what the situation in the Middle East is going to look like with regards to oil. I asked for those reports. I filed a F.O.I.A. request; they refused to comply with my F.O.I.A. request. They said it was too broad. I narrowed it, they still said it was too broad. I sued them. Recently they said that ‘We’ll give you some documents as long as you promise to never file a F.O.I.A. request again and don’t have anyone else file a F.O.I.A. request on your behalf.’

Rep. Mark DeSaulnier {D-Calif.}: How is that legal?

LEOPOLD: I don’t know but they put this in writing and I’m really looking forward to the day when I write this story up.

The reports, says Leopold, aren’t classified. As reported by U.S.A. Today:  One O.N.A. study appraised the body language patterns of Russian President Vladimir Putin and other world leaders.

More from Leopold: “Not only will they not give up the reports, they can’t find the reports,” he said, alleging government waste.

Lt. Col. Valerie Henderson {Defense Department}: “As a matter of policy, we don’t comment on legal matters,”

What did Val get her diploma from PotUS George Bush's policy of failing to fight back at slander? She must have missed the part where he admitted the strategy fails.

However, I doubt O.N.A. is as full of rainbows, kittens, and puppy dogs such as George was... before his second term.

Of course, Val is just doing her job.  It's not as if a misogynistic chauvinistic statist such as PotUS Barry Soetoro would let her think for herself.

Letter to Tea Party people

2 things to help with PR battle.  Young people are 'new' and so is the 60% who are busy living their life versus reading the newspaper.  The common layperson sees "liberal" as 'libertarian' or 'liberty'.   Speak their language if you want "the general public" to understand instead of those in District of Columbia.  They already see themselves as "libertarians" and if we want to 'correct' them;  First step is to start speaking in a way they understand, instead of repeating the Statists' "misspellings and incorrect grammar".

• Use the correct dictionary definition of "liberal" which is libertarian.  Democrats are 'statist', 'socialists', or 'communists' but on the opposite end of the spectrum to 'liberals'.
• "Democratic Party" fails to exist.  There is only the "Democrat Party";  Which of course also fails but in an another topic.

A user's misspelling words and incorrect grammar on a message board, twitter, or some other social media technology is fine, and perfectly understandable.  For an 'organization' to do so, detracts from the 'message' as people automatically think less of the organization.  These common grammar error makes our organization look foolish, illiterate, uneducated, and ignorant.

I think misrepresenting the word 'liberal' is intentional as far as the Carnegie Foundation, Tides Foundation, George Soros, and their ilk are concerned.  They love being called a sheep instead of a wolf; or angels instead of the demons.  It confuses the low information voter.

Also, I think the mistake with the word "Democratic" is intentional for similar reasons.  Though maybe its more of a sign of how far our education system has fallen.

Apparently people often fail to realize how much power words have, especially when they are spoken with "mistakes".

Laffer Curve

Cutting taxes raises revenue. This relationship works in reverse as well. Increases taxes reduces revenue. Only the broken psyche of the so called "Democrats", and their statist ilk, have a problem with this scientific and mathematical logic. Yet the statist created agency called the Congressional Budget Office {C.B.O.} confuse the reverse of the Laffer Curve as true. This is why "Congress" in Washington D.C. get such wrong numbers one what effect their bills have on the economy.

For two centuries science has been able to compile mathematical economic numbers for trillions of transactions in free market economies around the world. In the early 1900s a man named John Maynard Keyne wrongly assumed that government spending has a positive effect on the economy. The statists Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, and Franklin D. Roosevelt all grabbed onto this theory immediately like a lifesaver thrown to someone drowning. So, economics quickly created a name for this too called Keynesian economics.

The problem is that to spend money, government must use force to "take" money from its citizens. Doing this destroys jobs! The effect is so disastrous that there is zero hope for the government to create more jobs than are lost. The reason this is true is because when the government does this. Those who have money "protect" their money and protecting it is the opposite of investing it. So the total amount of money taken out of the system is greater than what the government has to spend.

Even if the Government creates more money this actually creates a universal tax by default. This universal tax is inflation as every dollar is worth less than it was yesterday. It takes more dollars to buy the same thing today than it did yesterday. This is what inflation is and it destroys wealth. This action is so disastrous that economists have a special name for it called "monetizing" the debt. The Federal Reserve Bank, has been doing it for half a decade now and it is demonically evil for them to do so.

Only private sector investments creates jobs. There is a sweet bell in the Laffer Curve around thirteen percent. This thirteen percent is the sweet spot where tax revenue is maximized. Another way to look at this is to realize that the "economy" is like water. If you make a fist, the water slips through your fingers. When you open your hands and form a cup, you hold a great deal more water than your fist ever could.

The mind of a statist is locked in the past. All they see is last years "economy" and falsely wish they could take a slice of the pie. This is how the C.B.O. comes up with numbers that are so very wrong. The reason they are wrong is because the pie is yesterday's pie and we are talking about a "future" pie. Through taking action today.

A Libertarian like Laffer uses geometry and calculus, instead of algebra, to come up with numbers of next year. Look at recent history of trends and overall change in various different ways. Then a winner like Laffer uses calculus and geometry to make the hurdle of finding "next years" numbers. The more precise the data the more accurate they end up being. That is how an agency like the Heritage Foundation create a track record of being right 96.8% of the time. Among other things they do what the C.B.O. does but Heritage ends up be right far more often.