Personal journal or diary of a witch, Jedi, Reverand, Son, Tay Tay's husband. Contained here in is simply a collection of opinions, with me creating hyperlinks to better define various elements that may need to be unpacked from the zip file of a name or term.
Bridging the Goddess of Thunder, is best served by the relationship between Thor and Mrs. Jane Foster being rekindled, think do I. It gives a basic way for Thor to stay in the new "Hero's Journey" for Mrs. Foster.
Why 'Mrs.' Foster? Because that keeps the mystical nature of the deity of Thunder in Asgard's royal family tree. There is still an abundance of territory that could be covered by the Hero's Journey of Mrs. Foster. Romance continues for decades after a couple meet.
They should forget the title "Thor" for the movies with Mrs. Jane Foster as the Goddess of Thunder. Thor is the personal name of the character played by Chris Helmsworth, instead of his title as the God of Thunder, as Odin himself reiterated to his son.
As a fan of the Marvel Cinemaverse from its inception, it is easy say this is a good movie, feel do I. It follows the basic formula of the Hero’s Journey that makes for a good movie. The character is supposed to initially be as stoic as Spock, thus that complaint about Ms. Larson is bereft of merit. Overall, the character would be better off with a couple more movies to define her audience and character herself, think do I.
It is amazing how far all pundits have over reacted to Ms. Larson’s comments. Of course, what she said was still retarded because most of the audience for comic book movies are male, so it stands to reason most critics are male. Of course there are gal fans and that is applauded by me. However, a standard rule of success in business is to reach for a wider audience ’without’ alienating the existing fans.
Captain Marvel gets a ⭐️⭐️⭐️✨ from me. It is a fun comic book origin story, however the lack of a romance subplot retards the appeal towards a wider audience. However, the movie was already very busy with plot threads, so it would have taken a major overhaul of the basic outline to make room, think do I.
Dr. Bruce Banner is a different type of superhero and Marvel has failed to really do him right; Kind of like the Superman curse, with which certain writers seem afflicted. That is they have trouble knowing how to write a movie where fighting should only ever be at the end and as the last straw, because he will always win.
That is just an integral part of the character, for the same reason Captain America was able to go toe to toe, in strength, with Thanos wearing an Infinity Gauntlet. Their strength is literally indomitable, but seemingly a lot of script writers seem to get hit with the stupid stick when writing a Hulk movie. That is because they seem to think that people want to see a whole 2/3 hour movie of him playing whackamole with Loki.
Conversely, the audience can be easily be mislead by advertising for a Hulk movie, by studio execs who make the mistake of advertising it as a rocky type type superhero movie. Only for the audience to be shown a romantic comedy/tragedy with a cameo of the Hulk. NeverTheLess, expecting your entire audience to be ignorant of one of the founding movies of the Marvel Cinemaverse; Only serves to insult those viewers who do remember.
Ed Norton was an awesome Hulk, think do I. Sadly and seemingly, his High Self allowing his Ego to get in the way of the Marvel Cinemaverse is a felicitous tragedy, all by itself. A hypothesis of mine is for Marvel Entertainment to support the best of both worlds. Continue with Mark Ruffalo's promised minimovie through the Avengers movies, and have Ed Norton continue his T.I.H. series. The scripts for either movie would come from the same timeline... so what happens in Avengers effects the world depicted in the solo movie arc, and vice’a’versa.
However, don't feel bad because the M.C.U. Writers {1} too, seem to be writing the Dr. Banner as if T.I.H. is invisible, while officially saying the opposite. For instance, why is Bruce forgetting about the obsessive compulsive reciprocating love affair he has with Betty Ross, and giving Black Widow gugu eyes…?…
As for letting two, Ed Norton and Mark Ruffalo, actors portraying literally the same character. James Bond anyone? As long as it is officially acknowledged and they are both proper movies vaguely following “The Hero’s Journey”, the fans will love it, think do I. It allows us to have more great superhero movies, if done correctly audiences from different genres will have a taste of the M.C.U., and it meshes better with Marvel Entertainment's already heavy work load with their existing decade long production schedule. Deadpool, Captain Marvel, Ant’Man, et cetera already have taken them by surprise and made the timeline distorted.
Admitedly, the producers and directors of the Marvel Cinemaverse, are seemingly big on “redemption” of those very far aligned towards service’to’self. Thus the idea of Thanos reversing the snap has merity. However, seemingly part of Dr. Strange’s plan was for Thanos to slide a facet of the Time Stone from its own ‘future’. That is what caused the destruction of the Infinity Gauntlet in the possession of Thanos.
The Infinity Gauntlet was being compelled to create a future that was directly incompatable with the origin timeline of the Time Stone used in the gauntlet. Didn’t notice how neither Dr. Strange nor Thanos actually touched the Time Stone? Seemingly they held it by it’s aura... or whatever that was around it. Therefore, that was part of Dr. Strange’s plan, to destroy Thanos’s greatest weapon, the gauntlet.
As with the release of the annoucnement trailer for Avengers: Endgame... Mr. Tony Stark is in a bad way... however you are right. Dr. Strange’s actions lead to Tony staying alive, and realizing his Ironman suit could make Thanos bleed.
The answer that is of want by me is Deadpool uses Cable’s time watch to save Mr. Stark .. cleaning up the timeline. :) However, it is likely the answer seems to be both teamwork and family. Dr. Strange already DID use his greatest weapon free of Thanos even realizing he was being manipulated by some Dues Machina.
Ultimately, we know whatever happens, Mr. Stark will survive because he still has to ensure a future for the Stark family. Mrs. Pepper Potts needs to start popping out kids, the family can obviously afford to be big, and even our own modern knowledge could ensure Mrs. Potts continued in great health during and after the pregnancies.
In addition, Spiderman: Homecoming II is already in production, thus the kid is brought back. Thus we know whatever happens involves at least his, ressurection. It seem very probable others such as Vision and T’Challa will accompany him. However, it seems also probable that there will be a few such as Gamora who will stay dead... ok the characters involved have just as much motivation to see her return, however the point is they are likely to maintain the theme that this is a war. One of the Cardinal Pillars to the M.C.U. that attracts so many is it’s contuity and consistency.
In any war, even innocents die and especially soldiers. For the audience, to “feel” this and have the emotional payoff at the end of “The Hero’s Journey” the characters that die have to have a connection with the audience. That means important characters, that drastically change the reality of those with strong relationships with them. Such as Gamora, Star Lord, and her adopted’sister, Nebula... and others obviously. Furthermore, the audience has been reminded that she spent most of her life as Thanos’s right hand of death killing many. It is “recent” that she is redeaming herself.
As for everyone else, God of Lightning Thor Odinson already proved his combat superiority over the army corps of Thanos and himself. Thor single handedly turned the tide of a battle that appeared to be headed towards another “fawless victory” for the army corps of Thanos. The annoucnement trailor for Captain Marvel has shown her appearing to be just as powerful as Thor, if not more. The trailer put her dangerously close to the territory of being a Mary Sue, think do I. Of course, the movie will still be seen in theaters by me. The trailor for Avengers: Endgame also seems to suggest that Ant’man may also figure into how they achieve victory in the jaws of defeat. …
Vision is a connundrum to be sure, he admitted his psyche was a product of the Mind Gem’s personality just as much as Mr. Stark’s J.A.R.V.I.S. program. It is a hypothesis of mine, that connection has enabled Vision to continue even when without the corporeal bio’synthetioc shell, yet be stuck with the Mind Gem. Whatever happens he may be the one to turn the tide via manipulating Thanos.
Seemingly, the author of that YouTube video fails to understand for what S.J.W. {Social Justice Warrior} stands, think do I. Did they watch G.o.t.G. I &/ II…?… Where exactly is the #statist ideology being obscenely propogandized…?… Necrophilia is wrong elsewhere on the internet, so why is this different…?…
This is very similar to someone making a Great War movie that becomes a blockbuster; So abruptly, a century after the series of ears, people abruptly choose to want to make Germany to pay reparations. That is just one example, how about a movie illustrating the plantation owner roots of the Democrat Party, or how they voted against the Republican Party backed Civil Rights of the 1960s/70s…
Speaking of crime… where is it? People are choosing to get all bent out of shape because Mr. Gunn chose to repeat/retweet a couple bad jokes? Certainly the jokes are very bad; Yet that is a crime now…?…
It is said conservatives are pushing this tragedy: So they ask statists to calm down on P.o.t.U.S. Trump zinger jokes & his efforts to intentionally 'trigger' the L.S.M.; Yet they are all for ruining Mr. Gunn's career over a couple words they choose to dislike…?… apparently more than just statists are a bunch of hypocritical bigots, feel do I..
Personal responsibility is big with me, but so is liberty. Tuerefore, what is the crime Mr. Gunn committed…?… Currently, it is still legal to have an acquaintance be a pedofile.
What country is left, that actually respects individual liberty, above and beyond mob and the Swamp, ask do I…?…
So to the entire media and world, "…congradulations on ruining someone's life, just so you can fell better about themself by stepping on someone else." Thus the idea of 🐭Disney🦆 reversing their incredibly shortsighted and horrid decision of firing Mr. Gunn, is a prayer of mine.
The reason is simple, unlike Ms. Kathleen Kennedy, Mr. Gunn exceeds Disney's expectations. His ideas create half a billion dollars in profit, instead of her ideas which brings ruin to a multi billion dollar franchise. The comparison is sadtell do I, because it would be awesome for a female executive to be just as successful, if not moreso; Yet that is the situation, and thus it is retarded to fire him but keep her.
What makes it even worse is that in stark contrast to Ms {really because who would marry such a toxic pill of poisonif they had a choice} Kennedy, Mr. Gunn has sincerely apologized numerous times in the past and willingly did so againwithout hesitation or prompting from Disney, while they deliberated. It was also an actual apology, instead of the "…sorry, not sorry…" we get from FemiNazies and S.J.W.s.
Thusvirtually, by metaphysically Disney's reactionary decision is monolithically moronically retarded. It's like we are watching Dumb & Dumber 3, except it's real and so Disney seems oblivious to how they are humiliating themselves, think do I.
Others of like mind, please join the 🙏prayer🙏 of mine…
Loving comic books and especially movies based on comic books certainly helps; However, I believe that those who have wondered what happens after and between events in an epic will find Marvel Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. blissfully entertaining.
The creators of the show and the movies do a wonderstrukk play of consistently weaving the stories from the movies into one world. The Marvel Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. series goes further with illuminating and illustrating what happens after Iron Man, Captain America, et cetera save the world. The series has its own stories that have their own part to play in the larger tapestry of the Marvel materia.
Marvel Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.'s first season's main story arc culminated with a different point of view to the new Captain America: Winter Soldier. The second season has just started; Therefore, I believe it will be interesting to see what movie the second season ties into and the part it will play.
The writers do a masterful job of helping the entire Marvel materia to be more believable. Every character and event has a myriad of levels, and are individualistically unique. From; The young orphan technological savant girl, Skye's quest to find her birth parents. Or; Discovering T.A.H.I.T.I. and how it relates to Agent Phil Coulson's biblical resurrection. To; Handling the materia left after the alien invasion Thor thwarted.
I have been imagining a show such as Marvel Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. for a very long time now. I never thought it likely until I started learning more about manifesting. Even now I just connected the dots as I am typing.
In an effort to manifest the next stage, I pray and beg the Goddess to absolutely manifest a story in the Star Wars omniverse of: The Old Republic. For those who struggle to understand dues machina, Disney deciding to grant my prayer is the Goddess responding 'through' them. Of course, I could be wrong and just any Star Wars television series would help the most with my choice to be happy.
In the Latin language Dies, translates into American English as: "Day of". I refer to the moon as Luna or Phaeton, and the later because I believe that is the largest chunk of earth left of the planet that orbited between Mars and Jupiter. May be the majority of society disagrees with this assessment of mine, but I find that irrelevant. I refuse to let society dictate to me what I name objects.
When a Statist says "conservative" their intention is to convey that the subject 'resists change' and is 'traditional' in all ways. This is the true and original definition of the word. It probably originates from when the Democrat Party was actually a libertarian oriented party, and refers to their opposition.
When a Republican or Tea Party sapien says "conservative" they are referring to a libertarian system of beliefs, such that the President of the United States Ronald Reagan materialized. It appears those that continue to support this delusional view are actually statists themselves. The opposition that actually exemplify libertarian views refuse to let this failure in language continue.
Of this language disparity, I absolutely and abundantly beg and pray for the Goddess to absolutely manifest the majority to correct this mistake in language. The different definitions only helps the Statist's with their propaganda brainwashing campaign, in addition derision being its very nature.
Of course, the lame stream media is reporting "Republican" taking over the Senate as becoming more likely. This was decided a long time ago, but the Statist have their story to tell as they try, and fail, to retain their power. As Atlas Shrugged's John Galt says: "join us, or get out of the way".
