1.18.2019

♥ 1 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ 0 6 ♥ 0 3 ♥ 0 0 ♥ Lady'Daes ♥ Netflix: Io

The 🎥 movie 🎥 has just been started by me.  This account will be updated after it is finished.  However, this bit seems very important to the distortion lens of mine.  A fundamental problem modern writers often have, is with the context of the post'apocalypse.  They often start a story off with "all of humanity did this…";  Unfortunately Mr. Jonathan Helpert falls into that crowd, think do I.

The flaw is thinking that there only exists one viable answer to any given problem.  They assume that because they are ignorant of why oxygen remains, that it is inevitable that it will disappear.  Adoptinga path from a prediction based in ignorance is an insane choice.   Then the author further compounds the error by assuming, that in the event such a great tragedy were to occur, there is only one solution, feel do I.  This is inherent in suggesting that only one group survived… the one that is self'named the 'Exodus' group.

These mistakes are compounded by suggesting that humanity as a whole all built starships to launch on the exact same year, day, hour, minute, and second.  It is ludicrous to even consider, because crowds fail to behave such as that.  Others would have proposed viable solutions that would  have resulted in more communities than the hermit and Io.

Of course, the mere existence of the protagonist inherently contradicts that whole chain of assumptions.  Yet the writer treats the artificially narrow and rigid thinking, as if its noteworthiness is lacking.  Suspension of Disbelief is real and good, but some modern writers seem to choose to use it as a crutch to beat the audience over the head with political dogma.

This could be a strong source as to why a few sapient choose to not realize that Climate Change is  occurring on all planets in our solar system according to N.A.S.A.'s own studies.  This could also be exacerbated by the Deep State owning ninety’one percent of all media companies that pay writers of fiction tries to treat the debunked hypothesis as pseudo'fact.

Of course, this is just unsubstantiated conjecture, but it seems doubtful that many sapients have been using gasoline burning engines on Pluto, Charon, Mercury, Mars, Juptiter, and its moons, Saturn, and its moons, Neptune, and its moons, Uranus, and its moons, Nibiru {Planet IX}, and any moons it may or may not have.  It is precisely because our sun is spewing more radiation that we know that even Pluto has an atmosphere.  Said atmosphere is changing and becoming more energetic.

The choice to write with the context of fiction, tragedies, and/or comedies are big ones because it limits the audience.  The choice to write with the context of Science Fiction, limits it even further.  Therefore, why a lot of modern writers feel compelled based their context of Science Fiction, Fantasy, Post’ Apocalypse on political dogma seems greatly beyond all rational or logical thought.

This is similar to how many artists feel compelled to be political.  The public may follow an actor but that is because of their art.  That choice is free of any relevancy to the actor’s political beliefs.  The plebeian desire is only in so far as to be entertained.  Being insulted. degraded, demeaned, and censored for simply chooseing an opposing perception fails to come even close to entertaining to plebeians, think do I.

Watching or reading novels with a context that is based on horrendously and blatantly flawed context also falls short of being entertaining to plebeians,, feel do I.

No comments:

Post a Comment