Personal journal or diary of a witch, Jedi, Reverand, Son, Tay Tay's husband. Contained here in is simply a collection of opinions, with me creating hyperlinks to better define various elements that may need to be unpacked from the zip file of a name or term.
All gov ”bills” have their title be the exact opposite of what it does... Such as the Affordable Care Act… should be called unaffordable…
Mr. Corey Goode, Mr. David Wilcock, et cetera have been, are, and will always be attacked by kabal; They are a direct existential threat to the narrative supported by The Swamp; Instead, perhaps we should choose to see this as a positive, such as with Trump, suggest do I. The more the Kabal attacks Mr. Goode, Mr. Wilcock, et cetera the more it will help spread the good word… The Barbara Streisand Effect is real…
Thus maybe, for a change, instead we should be the ones co’opting our own Co’Creative power, think do I. Instead of letting the Ls.M. {Lamestream Media} control it against our own interest, by what news they choose to actually report.
Once a source chooses to lie to their audience, for instance all of the cable news channels, then it is foolish for us to trust anything said by them. As the audience, it is impossible to discern fact from lie. FoxNews may be the best channel for only omitting news that they are instructed to disfavor, but lying by omission is still lying.
A good example of that is, trusting anything accusatory said by Dr. Steven M. Greer when he himself has admitted to being BFFs with the Rockefeller dynasty. Best yet is to choose to disbelieve any accusation that is without empirical evidence to support it, feel do I. Someone commenting that another is ”wrong” fails to be empirical. Neither is it particularly effective in elevating discourse for the benefit of anyone. 😅
🌒🌕🌘
Dr. Greer can be found talking about himself here:
Perhaps the disbelief in the author is due to the supermajority of liberals {libertarians} are smart enough to know an opinion, even when the author falsely asserts it is a fact, and a fictitious straw man argument when they read one, propose do I. Again, they insist on incorrectly sermonizing, demeaning, and insulting the loyalists. In addition, may be the divide is because the data points used to support their argument falsely label ‘statists’ of the left wing as “liberals”, which is absolutely false.
The fact that they include the word “libertarian” as the label for liberals does our work for in showing how the opposition is absurd. That is why a liberals may choose to avoid voting; 'Cause they refuse to even acknowledge the existence of District of Columbia's comedy of errors. However, I do agree we should vote because it is a positive affirmation. Far too many allow themselves to be dragged down into negative thinking, which abundantly fails to serve us.
The authors assertion of the label “antiimmigrant” is fictitious, as well as degrading, insulting, and demonizing. Such a belief fails to actually be represented in the mind of any politician, regardless of about what the media bloviates. The loyalists are for ‘forcing all immigration to be LEGAL’. Overhauling the immigration system is a great idea.
Yet we should BE the change we want, instead of using the smear tactics of the authoritarians and kabals. Another issue is actually listening to what the opposition and loyalists actually say, instead of what your chosen flavor of media reports on them. Far to many are still letting themselves be played like a musical instrument. This article, as normal, definitions and guides have been peppered through this article as links.
We should propose an example of a good streamlined immigration system that is free of Cronyism and horrendous waiting periods. For instance, an iteration of Japan’s Immigration Policy. Where all are able to apply for temporary work visas; After working for three months the immigrant must apply for a three year work visa; Then after working for that time period, an immigrant applies for a permanent work visa. This means immigrants get paid justly for their time and skills. Of course, only after another three years are they able to apply for citizenship.
Then let states hire whatever private company they wish to conduct this new system. A system where the only criteria of whether to grant the visa or not is if they have a job, and then if they have worked for the assigned period of time. Have the F.B.I. randomly audit the contractors in the performance of their contract, to insure everything is working as intended.
Why would a rational and logical mind want foreigners without a clue about actual life in America voting in our elections ‘before’ they are acclimated? Statists only want the illegal immigrants to vote because they think they will replace the African American voting block over which they have been steadily losing control. They are probably abundantly wrong, think do I. Mexicans seem a lot more family and religious oriented in Mexico, than blacks in Nigeria, feel do I. And that is what a lot of the less educated souls who identify as an African American, say that they want… to go back to their “roots”.
Yet, their roots are where their neighboring tribes forced them to heel in slavery and then sold them to whoever wanted them. This slave trade still exists today and it has existed for longer than acknowledged history. So why would a rational and logical mind want to go back to such “roots”?
04:07 ~ It is possible to limit the 'manipulation' and still use FaceBook. Yet, why doing so is a questionable use of time at best, and harmful at worst. This, and other iNewspapers, is why it is a questionable use of time. It is probably more useful to extrovert, instead of introverts such as myself.
Create FaceBook Account or strip your existing one of likes or friends. Then hide it from the web. Then add, or keep, only the friends of which you actually are interested in letting their eventful news interrupt your daily life.
That alone limits the FaceBook "news feed" to only them. Ironically, FaceBook has been pretty good with responding to whatever security concerns that arise, whether it is adding security on their end or security options/tools for the user.
At this time also consider limiting any 'likes' to charities and/or organizations, of which you actively are willing to let their news interrupt your daily life.
Then install the FaceBook app {on Google'Play} on your phone, but only have this 'cloaked' account logged in. That way you are automatically 'pinged' when there is news from the friends if which you choose to care. That is far from necessarily a bad thing.
Time management is a necessary skill in life, as mortals we are unable to help or pay attention to absolutely everyone simultaneously, let alone to still have time for ourselves. That said, helping charity and/or friends are, as well, an absolutely necessary part of ascending in this life. Everyday ask yourself whether any particular decision helps others or helps yourself.
How do you think celebrities even have the time to use FaceBook at all...?... However, if you are a fan of someone please avoid using this as a trigger to go searching for, and hounding their hidden account... privacy is important even for celebrities, regardless of what the courts say. Just consider, if hiw willingly you are too let pure strangers to interrupt your life... Then realize that negative attacks or replies, fail to ever end positively.
While using this cloaked F.B. account, avoid 'liking' or visiting anywhere on FaceBook but the 'Home' page and only charities and organizations that are actively welcome to interrupt thy daily life. That makes a F.B. NewsFeed full of only news that have generically been welcomed previously; And thus TruthStream Media's friends may find it easier to reach her for the next baby shower. ;)
Choosing to be 'ignorant' of the psychological effect that their product, would have had far worse fall out. They are designing their product to literally subconsciously help others choose to be happy, how is that a bad thing...?... "Everything" and even life itself has a "psychological impact" and most of it is subconscious for us mere mortals. That someone is getting paid to help us use some of that subconscious, to help others choose to be happy seems abundantly far from a criminal act to me.
The producers of TruthStream Media seems very intelligent, wise, and awake to me; However, there will always be a certain portion of thr public that are less intelligent, wise, and/or awake. Of course, all are spiritually equal in the eyes of the Divine. Yet, those people who are 'younger' souls will simply be unable to see what we, or what older souls that have weathered more stress, allow themselves to see.
In addition, TruthStream's description of the manipulation done by Social Media companies, and specifically FaceBook; Seems as if they think there is this mythical place where people are free of all influences. Yet even the idea of such a place seems rather horrid to me.
Humans are social creatures, and even intelligence itself is largely a trait only advanced by being an active 'member' of society. Therefore, to be alive is to accept that others have influence on the thyself.
We humans are social creatures, if such a place did exist...?... we would devolve and die. There are actually psychological real world examples of that. For instance, there were some horrible grand parents locked an unwanted child up in the attic for their entire life. When found... the now teenager was unable to coherently speak.
The point of mine, is that there will always be a segment of the public that have little interest in being consciously aware of their thoughts and emotions. Such as Morpheus's line in the Matrix. They will probably literally fight to stay within 'the matrix'.
They may be ready to ascend several lives from now; But the stress accumulated from additional lifetimes is how they will get there…?... Member the Buddhist saying there are many ways up the same mountain...?...
Thus, FaceBook and other social media, intentionally helping others subconsciously choose to live a happier life, seems pretty much like a good thing to me. Now if they were doing the opposite? that would be a problem, for me.
When the 'fear mongering' media has targeted someone; A better question is 'why'. P.o.t.U.S. Soetoro said himself, in a candid off'mic moment, that social media is his biggest enemy. It seems that is a view shared by many of Mikie {Military Industrial Complex}, or whatever the reader wants to call it. So why try to assist the Swamp in conjuring fear of social media...?...
Frankly, as the internet becomes used by more and more people; Hopefully other start up companies follow FaceBook's example of creating a subconscious positive feed back loop with their users. It is the same reason as why we eat food that tastes good, and why we throw away food that tastes bad.
The hope, for other startup companies to draw inspiration from FaceBook is because the idea that its current size and command of the market share, is that it has become a negative for any given user, is shared by me. What they need is for MySpace to come back, along with others to grow in strength or be born and create a healthy Free Market place with abundant competition.
Abundant capitalistic competition in any field is always a benefit for the consumer. Producers tend to be less enthused about it, but that just means they too are aware.
Having multiple channels in social media, increases the difficulty of the N.S.A., C.I.A., D.H.S., F.B.I. or any other agency in the alphabet soup to try to censor content, for "national security". And anyone paying attention to Twitter and YouTube know there is far too much of that going around already. Maybe people will remember why the scariest words in the English language are: "We are from the government, we are here to help." instead of forgetting why we're laughing.
So the suggestion of mine, is to pray for those forces to emerge and become stronger. That way T.S.M., and others have greater security in telling us information that the Mikies think validates their national security.
The government really should be 'afraid' of us citizens. When citizens are afraid of the government, that is tyranny. Companies such as FaceBook that command an excessive share of the market has made themselves part of the problem. Please, just remember that peaceful civil disobedience is far more inspiring towards other and less divisive than the violent kind.
However, honestly FaceBook is rarely used by me... that may change in the future, and if it does I will likely follow the above steps.
